Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
Ellen Driessen, Steven D. Hollon, Claudi L. H. Bockting, Pim Cuijpers, Erick H. Turner. Does Publication Bias Inflate the Apparent Efficacy of Psychological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of US National Institutes of Health-Funded Trials. PLOS ONE. 10(9):e0137864. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137864
View Full Reference
1.
Harriet A. Carroll, Zoi Toumpakari, Laura Johnson, James A. Betts. The perceived feasibility of methods to reduce publication bias. PLOS ONE. 12(10):e0186472. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186472
View Full Reference
1.
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt. Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. PLOS ONE. 12(12):e0189311. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189311
View Full Reference
1.
Till Bruckner, Susanne Wieschowski, Miriam Heider, et al. Measurement challenges and causes of incomplete results reporting of biomedical animal studies: Results from an interview study. PLOS ONE. 17(8):e0271976. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271976
View Full Reference
1.
Kerry Dwan, Carrol Gamble, Paula R. Williamson, Jamie J. Kirkham. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review. PLOS ONE. 8(7):e66844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066844
View Full Reference
1.
David Moher, Lex Bouter, Sabine Kleinert, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology. 18(7):e3000737. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
View Full Reference
1.
John P. A. Ioannidis. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLOS Medicine. 2(8):e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
View Full Reference
1.
Jay Bhattacharya, Mikko Packalen. Encouraging Edge Science through NIH Funding Practices. Stanford: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research; :4. https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/policy-brief/encouraging-edge-science-through-nih-funding-practices.
View Full Reference
1.
Malcolm R. Macleod, Aaron Lawson McLean, Aikaterini Kyriakopoulou, et al. Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement. PLOS Biology. 13(10):e1002273. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273
View Full Reference
1.
NIH Center for Scientific Review. Reviewer Surveys — Feedback on CSRs’ Bias Awareness and Mitigation Training. https://public.csr.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/Reviewer_Bias_Training_Survey_Report_2022-01_Council_Round_final.pdf.
View Full Reference