Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
Anne Gärtner, Daniel Leising, Felix D. Schönbrodt. Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality. PLOS Biology. 22(2):e3002553. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002553
View Full Reference
1.
Liv Langfeldt, Lina Ingeborgrud, Ingvild Reymert, Silje Marie Svartefoss, Siri Brorstad Borlaug. Evaluation of the Spark Pilot: Identifying Novel and Unconventional Research by Doubleblinded Peer Review. Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2995910.
View Full Reference
1.
ASAPbio. Peer review survey results. https://asapbio.org/peer-review/survey.
View Full Reference
1.
Michael W. Brunt, Daniel M. Weary. Public consultation in the evaluation of animal research protocols. PLOS ONE. 16(12):e0260114. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260114
View Full Reference
1.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. Minimizing Unconscious Bias in Peer Revew. https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/Minimizing-Unconscous-Bias.pdf.
View Full Reference
1.
NIH Center for Scientific Review. CSR Initiatives to Address Bias in Peer Review. https://public.csr.nih.gov/AboutCSR/Address-Bias-in-Peer-Review.
View Full Reference