Bias, peer review, and publishing

Kay Dickersin. The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1385-1389. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440100097014

David F. Horrobin. The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1438-1441. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440100162024

W. Brian Arthur. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. The Economic Journal. 1989;99(394):116-131. doi:10.2307/2234208

Douglas P. Peters, Stephen J. Ceci. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1982;5(2):187-195. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00011183

Mary Lee Smith. Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluation in Education. 1980;4:22-24. doi:10.1016/0191-765X(80)90004-X

Robert K. Merton. The Matthew Effect in Science. Science. 1968;159(3810):56-63. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56

INORMS Research Evaluation Group. The SCOPE Framework: A Five-Stage Process for Evaluating Research Responsibly. Kanazawa; :19. https://inorms.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/21655-scope-guide-v10.pdf.

Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment. Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment. Brussels; :23. https://coara.eu/app/uploads/2022/09/2022_07_19_rra_agreement_final.pdf.

Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind, Sara Levander, Wieland Wermke, eds. Peer Review in an Era of Evaluation: Understanding the Practice of Gatekeeping in Academia. 1st ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham; :XIX, 402. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75263-7.

Michele Avissar-Whiting, Frédérique Belliard, Stefano M. Bertozzi, et al. Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science. PLOS Biology. 22(2):e3002502. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002502