1.
Malin Masterton, Tobias Renberg, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong. Patients’ attitudes towards animal testing: “To conduct research on animals is, I suppose, a necessary evil.” BioSocieties. 2014;9(1):24-41. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2013.39
Ethics, policy, and legislation
1.
Australian Research Council. Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes.; 2013. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/australian-code-care-and-use-animals-scientific-purposes.
1.
Lawrence Arthur Hansen. Institution animal care and use committees need greater ethical diversity. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(3):188-190. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100982
1.
US Institute of Medicine, US National Research Council. Emerging Legal Trends Impacting Animal Research. In: International Animal Research Regulations: Impact on Neuroscience Research: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK100123/.
1.
Elisabeth H. Ormandy, Julie Dale, Gilly Griffin. Genetic engineering of animals: Ethical issues, including welfare concerns. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 2011;52(5):544-550. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3078015/.
1.
National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guide-for-the-care-and-use-of-laboratory-animals.pdf.
1.
European Parliament. Directive 2010 63 EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. Vol. L 276/33.; 2010:47. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/63/oj/eng.
1.
Joakim Hagelin, Hans-Erik Carlsson, Jann Hau. An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: some factors that may influence the outcome. Public Understanding of Science. 2003;12(1):67-81. doi:10.1177/0963662503012001247
1.
United States Congress. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations: Title 9.; 1996. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-9/chapter-I/subchapter-A.
1.
Linda K. Pifer. Exploring the gender gap in young adults’ attitudes about animal research. Society & Animals: Social Scientific Studies of the Human Experience of Other Animals. 1996;4(1):37-52. doi:10.1163/156853096x00034