Bias, peer review, and publishing

J. Rogers Hollingsworth. Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy. 2011;7(4):595-644. doi:10.1080/096922900750034563

Mark J. Rice. The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: the result is more animal-based research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. 2011;6:12. doi:10.1186/1747-5341-6-12

Kenny Smith. Learning bias, cultural evolution of language, and the biological evolution of the language faculty. Human Biology. 2011;83(2):261-278. doi:10.3378/027.083.0207

Donna K. Ginther, Walter T. Schaffer, Joshua Schnell, et al. Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science. 2011;333(6045):1015-1019. doi:10.1126/science.1196783

Sara Schroter, Trish Groves, Liselotte Højgaard. Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations’ and grant reviewers’ perspectives. BMC Medicine. 2010;8:62. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-62

Lawrence D. Berg, Jani Vuolteenaho, eds. Critical Toponymies: The Contested Politics of Place Naming. London: Routledge; 2009:306. https://www.routledge.com/Critical-Toponymies-The-Contested-Politics-of-Place-Naming/Berg-Vuolteenaho/p/book/9781138267756.

Steven A. Greenberg. How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. BMJ. 2009;339:b2680. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2680

Sonia M. R. Vasconcelos, Martha M. Sorenson, Jacqueline Leta. A new input indicator for the assessment of science & technology research?. Scientometrics. 2009;80:217-230. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2082-z

Trish Reay, C.R. Hinings. Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics. Organization Studies. 2009;30(6):629-652. doi:10.1177/0170840609104803

Erick H. Turner, Annette M. Matthews, Eftihia Linardatos, Robert A. Tell, Robert Rosenthal. Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;358(3):252-260. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa065779