1.
Jue Wang, Philip Shapira. Is There a Relationship between Research Sponsorship and Publication Impact? An Analysis of Funding Acknowledgments in Nanotechnology Papers. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117727. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117727
Bias, peer review, and publishing
1.
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alan D. Kaye, Mark V. Boswell, Joshua A. Hirsch. Medical Journal Peer Review: Process and Bias. Pain Physician. 2015;18(1):E1-E14. doi:10.36076/ppj/2015.18.E1
1.
Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, Ismael Rafols. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015;520(7548):429-431. doi:10.1038/520429a
1.
Seema Rawat, Sanjay Meena. Publish or perish: Where are we heading?. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2014;19(2):87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999612/.
1.
Valentina Tartari, Markus Perkmann, Ammon Salter. In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Research Policy. 2014;43(7):1189-1203. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.003
1.
Daniele Fanelli. Positive results receive more citations, but only in some disciplines. Scientometrics. 2013;94:701-709. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0757-y
1.
Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang, Blaise Cronin. Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012;64(1):2-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22784
1.
Declaration on Research Assessment. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.; 2012. https://sfdora.org/read/.
1.
Liv Langfeldt, Svein Kyvik. Researchers as evaluators: tasks, tensions and politics. Higher Education. 2011;62:199-212. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9382-y
1.
Craig M. Rawlings, Daniel A. McFarland. Influence flows in the academy: Using affiliation networks to assess peer effects among researchers. Social Science Research. 2011;40(3):1001-1017. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.10.002