Research funding

1.
Catharine E. Krebs, Sven Geissler, Kathrin Herrmann, et al. Exploring animal methods bias in biomedical research funding: Workshop proceedings and action steps. NAM Journal. 2025;1:100004. doi:10.1016/j.namjnl.2024.100004
View Full Reference
1.
Stephen A. Gallo, Michael Pearce, Carole J. Lee, Elena A. Erosheva. A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:10. doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7
View Full Reference
1.
Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Michael Rera, Edwin H. Wintermute, et al. Empowering grassroots innovation to accelerate biomedical research. PLOS Biology. 2021;19(8):e3001349. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001349
View Full Reference
1.
Belén Álvarez-Bornstein, María Bordons. Is funding related to higher research impact? Exploring its relationship and the mediating role of collaboration in several disciplines. Journal of Informetrics. 2021;15(1):101102. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101102
View Full Reference
1.
Stephen A. Gallo, Karen B. Schmaling, Lisa A. Thompson, Scott R. Glisson. Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2020;5(1):7. doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00093-0
View Full Reference
1.
Stephen Gallo, Lisa Thompson, Karen Schmaling, Scott Glisson. Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications. Environment Systems and Decisions. 2018;38:216-229. doi:10.1007/s10669-018-9677-6
View Full Reference
1.
John Coveney, Danielle L. Herbert, Kathy Hill, Karen E. Mow, Nicholas Graves, Adrian Barnett. ‘Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?’: observations on how peer review panels function. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2017;2(1):19. doi:10.1186/s41073-017-0043-x
View Full Reference
1.
Ferric C Fang, Anthony Bowen, Arturo Casadevall. NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity. eLife. 2016;5:e13323. doi:10.7554/eLife.13323
View Full Reference
1.
Till Bruckner, Susanne Wieschowski, Miriam Heider, et al. Measurement challenges and causes of incomplete results reporting of biomedical animal studies: Results from an interview study. PLOS ONE. 17(8):e0271976. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271976
View Full Reference
1.
Brianne A. Kent, Constance Holman, Emmanuella Amoako, et al. Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice. PLOS Biology. 20(7):e3001680. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680
View Full Reference