Research funding

Stephen A. Gallo, Michael Pearce, Carole J. Lee, Elena A. Erosheva. A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:10. doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7

Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Michael Rera, Edwin H. Wintermute, et al. Empowering grassroots innovation to accelerate biomedical research. PLOS Biology. 2021;19(8):e3001349. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001349

Belén Álvarez-Bornstein, María Bordons. Is funding related to higher research impact? Exploring its relationship and the mediating role of collaboration in several disciplines. Journal of Informetrics. 2021;15(1):101102. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101102

Stephen Gallo, Lisa Thompson, Karen Schmaling, Scott Glisson. Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications. Environment Systems and Decisions. 2018;38:216-229. doi:10.1007/s10669-018-9677-6

Ferric C Fang, Anthony Bowen, Arturo Casadevall. NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity. eLife. 2016;5:e13323. doi:10.7554/eLife.13323

Till Bruckner, Susanne Wieschowski, Miriam Heider, et al. Measurement challenges and causes of incomplete results reporting of biomedical animal studies: Results from an interview study. PLOS ONE. 17(8):e0271976. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271976

Brianne A. Kent, Constance Holman, Emmanuella Amoako, et al. Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice. PLOS Biology. 20(7):e3001680. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680