1.
Hope Ferdowsian, Agustin Fuentes, L. Syd M. Johnson, Barbara J. King, Jessica Pierce. Toward an Anti-Maleficent Research Agenda. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2022;31(1):54-58. doi:10.1017/S0963180121000487
Research ethics
1.
Mike King, Hazem Zohny. Animal researchers shoulder a psychological burden that animal ethics committees ought to address. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2022;48(5):299-303. doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106945
1.
Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Michael Rera, Edwin H. Wintermute, et al. Empowering grassroots innovation to accelerate biomedical research. PLOS Biology. 2021;19(8):e3001349. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001349
1.
Stijn Conix, Andreas De Block, Krist Vaesen. Grant Writing and Grant Peer Review As Questionable Research Practices.; 2021. doi:10.12688/f1000research.73893.2
1.
Jarrod Bailey, Shiranee Pereira. Advances in neuroscience imply that harmful experiments in dogs are unethical. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2018;44(1):47-52. doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103630
1.
Malin Masterton, Tobias Renberg, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong. Patients’ attitudes towards animal testing: “To conduct research on animals is, I suppose, a necessary evil.” BioSocieties. 2014;9(1):24-41. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2013.39
1.
Lawrence Arthur Hansen. Institution animal care and use committees need greater ethical diversity. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(3):188-190. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100982
1.
Eric P. Sandgren, Robert Streiffer, Jennifer Dykema, Nadia Assad, Jackson Moberg. Attitudes toward animals, and how species and purpose affect animal research justifiability, among undergraduate students and faculty. PLOS ONE. 15(5):e0233204. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233204
1.
Kelly D. Cobey, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Matthew J. Page, et al. Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research. PLOS Biology. 22(11):e3002870. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002870
1.
Aoife Milford, Eva De Clercq, Edwin Louis-Maerten, Lester D. Geneviève, Bernice S. Elger. How animal ethics committees make decisions – a scoping review of empirical studies. PLOS ONE. 20(3):e0318570. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318570