peer review

Ferric C Fang, Anthony Bowen, Arturo Casadevall. NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity. eLife. 2016;5:e13323. doi:10.7554/eLife.13323

Monya Baker. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533:452-454. https://www.nature.com/articles/533452a.

Liv Langfeldt, Svein Kyvik. Researchers as evaluators: tasks, tensions and politics. Higher Education. 2011;62:199-212. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9382-y

Harriet A. Carroll, Zoi Toumpakari, Laura Johnson, James A. Betts. The perceived feasibility of methods to reduce publication bias. PLOS ONE. 12(10):e0186472. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186472

Kerry Dwan, Carrol Gamble, Paula R. Williamson, Jamie J. Kirkham. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review. PLOS ONE. 8(7):e66844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066844

David Moher, Lex Bouter, Sabine Kleinert, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology. 18(7):e3000737. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737

Michele Avissar-Whiting, Frédérique Belliard, Stefano M. Bertozzi, et al. Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science. PLOS Biology. 22(2):e3002502. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002502

Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Ryan Liu, Shuchi Chawla, Federico Echenique, Nihar B. Shah. Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review. PLOS ONE. 18(7):e0283980. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283980

Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt. Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. PLOS ONE. 12(12):e0189311. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189311

Kelly D. Cobey, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Matthew J. Page, et al. Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research. PLOS Biology. 22(11):e3002870. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002870