Funding

Stefanie Schneider, Cat Morgan, Clayton Magill, Marion Hersh, Katherine Sang, Robert MacIntosh. Evidence Review: Peer Review Bias in the Funding Process: Main Themes and Interventions. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 2024. https://doi.org/10.17861/YDDH-B137.

Aurore Receveur, Jonathan Bonfanti, Stephanie D’Agata, et al. David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system. Ecology Letters. 2024;27(3):e14395. doi:10.1111/ele.14395

Francesca Pistollato, Gregor Burkhart, Pierre Deceuninck, et al. What public health challenges and unmet medical needs would benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration in the EU? A survey and multi-stakeholder debate. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024;12:1417684. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1417684

Michael S. Lauer, Jamie Doyle, Joy Wang, Deepshikha Roychowdhury. Associations of topic-specific peer review outcomes and institute and center award rates with funding disparities at the National Institutes of Health. eLife. 2021;10:e67173. doi:10.7554/eLife.67173

Francesca Pistollato, Camilla Bernasconi, Janine McCarthy, et al. Alzheimer’s Disease, and Breast and Prostate Cancer Research: Translational Failures and the Importance to Monitor Outputs and Impact of Funded Research. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(7):1194. doi:10.3390/ani10071194

Herbert W. Marsh, Upali W. Jayasinghe, Nigel W. Bond. Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. American Psychologist. 2008;63(3):160-168. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.160