Careers

1.
Nature. Nature is trialling transparent peer review — the early results are encouraging. Nature. 2022;603:8-8. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00493-w
View Full Reference
1.
Nature. Research evaluation needs to change with the times. Nature. 2022;601(7892):166-166. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00056-z
View Full Reference
1.
Devang Mehta. Highlight negative results to improve science. Nature. 2019. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02960-3.
View Full Reference
1.
Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, Ismael Rafols. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015;520(7548):429-431. doi:10.1038/520429a
View Full Reference
1.
Michele Avissar-Whiting, Frédérique Belliard, Stefano M. Bertozzi, et al. Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science. PLOS Biology. 22(2):e3002502. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002502
View Full Reference
1.
Brianne A. Kent, Constance Holman, Emmanuella Amoako, et al. Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice. PLOS Biology. 20(7):e3001680. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680
View Full Reference
1.
David Moher, Lex Bouter, Sabine Kleinert, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology. 18(7):e3000737. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
View Full Reference