Standards, reporting, and preregistration

1.
Erin C McKiernan, Philip E Bourne, C Titus Brown, et al. How open science helps researchers succeed. Peter Rodgers, ed. eLife. 2016;5:e16800. doi:10.7554/eLife.16800
View Full Reference
1.
Brian A. Nosek, Daniël Lakens. Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology. 2014;45(3):137-141. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
View Full Reference
1.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Standards for Initiating a Systematic Review. In: Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, Sally Morton, eds. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209515/.
View Full Reference
1.
Sandra Coecke, Michael Balls, Gerard Bowe, et al. Guidance on Good Cell Culture Practice - A report of the second ECVAM task force on Good Cell Culture Practice. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2005;33(3):261-287. doi:10.1177/026119290503300313
View Full Reference
1.
Norbert L. Kerr. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1998;2(3):196-217. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
View Full Reference
1.
International Society for Stem Cell Research. Standards for Human Stem Cell Use in Research. https://www.isscr.org/standards-document.
View Full Reference
1.
Springer. How to find reviewers. https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/editors/how-to-find-reviewers/32890.
View Full Reference
1.
PETA Science Consortium International e.V. In Silico / In Vitro Testing Resources. https://www.thepsci.eu/links-resources/.
View Full Reference