Standards, reporting, and preregistration

Mark Rubin. When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress. Review of General Psychology. 2017;21(4):308-320. doi:10.1037/gpr0000128

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Standards for Initiating a Systematic Review. In: Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, Sally Morton, eds. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209515/.

Sandra Coecke, Michael Balls, Gerard Bowe, et al. Guidance on Good Cell Culture Practice - A report of the second ECVAM task force on Good Cell Culture Practice. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2005;33(3):261-287. doi:10.1177/026119290503300313

Norbert L. Kerr. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1998;2(3):196-217. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4

International Society for Stem Cell Research. Standards for Human Stem Cell Use in Research. https://www.isscr.org/standards-document.

PLOS. Preregistration. https://plos.org/open-science/preregistration/.

Springer. How to find reviewers. https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/editors/how-to-find-reviewers/32890.

PETA Science Consortium International e.V. In Silico / In Vitro Testing Resources. https://www.thepsci.eu/links-resources/.

SciRev. All reviews received by SciRev. https://scirev.org/.

Scientific Data. Data Repository Guidance. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories.