1.
Houmam Araj, Leroy Worth, David T. Yeung. Elements of successful NIH grant applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2024;121(15):e2315735121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2315735121
Standards, reporting, and preregistration
1.
Elisabeth M. Bik. Publishing negative results is good for science. Access Microbiology. 2024;6(4):000792. doi:10.1099/acmi.0.000792
1.
David Pamies, Jason Ekert, Marie-Gabrielle Zurich, et al. Recommendations on fit-for-purpose criteria to establish quality management for microphysiological systems and for monitoring their reproducibility. Stem Cell Reports. 2024;19(5):604-617. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.03.009
1.
LEITE Sofia Batista, Mathew Brooke, Annamaria Carusi, et al. Promoting Reusable and Open Methods and Protocols (PRO-MaP). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2024. https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/46124.
1.
American Psychological Association. Preregistration. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/preregistration. Published 2024.
1.
Daniël Lakens, Cristian Mesquida, Sajedeh Rasti, Massimiliano Ditroilo. The benefits of preregistration and Registered Reports. Evidence-Based Toxicology. 2024;2(1):2376046. doi:10.1080/2833373X.2024.2376046
1.
Marcel LaFlamme. Improving Methods Reporting in the Life Sciences. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2024/07/24/guest-post-improving-methods-reporting-in-the-life-sciences/. Published 2024.
1.
The RIVER working group. Reporting In Vitro Experiments Responsibly – the RIVER Recommendations.; 2023. doi:10.31222/osf.io/x6aut
1.
Vibeke Fosse, Emanuela Oldoni, Florence Bietrix, et al. Recommendations for robust and reproducible preclinical research in personalised medicine. BMC Medicine. 2023;21:14. doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02719-0
1.
Camilla Svendsen, Paul Whaley, Gunn E. Vist, et al. Protocol for designing INVITES-IN, a tool for assessing the internal validity of in vitro studies. Evidence-Based Toxicology. 2023;1(1):2232415. doi:10.1080/2833373X.2023.2232415