Bias, peer review, and publishing

Talia H. Swartz, Ann-Gel S. Palermo, Sandra K. Masur, Judith A. Aberg. The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019;220(S2):S33-S41. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiz174

Nyssa J. Silbiger, Amber D. Stubler. Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM. PeerJ. 2019;7:e8247. doi:10.7717/peerj.8247

Travis A. Hoppe, Aviva Litovitz, Kristine A. Willis, et al. Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Science Advances. 2019;5(10):aww7238. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238

Susan Guthrie, Daniela Rodriguez Rincon, Gordon McInroy, Becky Ioppolo, Salil Gunashekar. Measuring bias, burden and conservatism in research funding processes. F1000Research. 2019;8:851. doi:10.12688/f1000research.19156.1

Delphine R. Boulbes, Tracy Costello, Keith Baggerly, et al. A survey on data reproducibility and the effect of publication process on the ethical reporting of laboratory research. Clinical Cancer Research. 2018;24(14):3447-3455. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0227

Elizabeth Walsh, Maeve Rooney, Louis Appleby, Greg Wilkinson. Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;176(1):47-51. doi:10.1192/bjp.176.1.47

Susan Guthrie, Ioana Ghiga, Steven Wooding. What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?. F1000Research. 2018;6:1335. doi:10.12688/f1000research.11917.2

Jeffrey Beck, Kathryn Funk, Melissa Harrison, et al. Publishing peer review materials. F1000Research. 2018;7:1655. doi:10.12688/f1000research.16460.1

Stephen Gallo, Lisa Thompson, Karen Schmaling, Scott Glisson. Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications. Environment Systems and Decisions. 2018;38:216-229. doi:10.1007/s10669-018-9677-6

Robyn Tamblyn, Nadyne Girard, Christina J. Qian, James Hanley. Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2018;190(16):E489-E499. doi:10.1503/cmaj.170901