1.
Nature. Research evaluation needs to change with the times. Nature. 2022;601(7892):166-166. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00056-z
Bias, peer review, and publishing
1.
Fatou Sarr, Sommer Knight, Dana Strauss, et al. Increasing the representation of Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour as students in psychology doctoral programmes. Canadian Psychology. 2022;63(4):479-499. doi:10.1037/cap0000339
1.
Geoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, et al. Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews. Environmental Evidence. 2022;11:12. doi:10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0
1.
Nathalie D. McKenzie, Raymond Liu, Alden V. Chiu, et al. Exploring Bias in Scientific Peer Review: An ASCO Initiative. JCO Oncology Practice. 2022;18(12):791-799. doi:10.1200/OP.22.00275
1.
Stephen Curry, Sarah de Rijcke, Anna Hatch, Dorsamy (Gansen) Pillay, Inge van der Weijden, James Wilsdon. The Changing Role of Funders in Responsible Research Assessment: Progress, Obstacles and the Way Ahead (RoRI Working Paper No.3). Sheffield: Research on Research Institute; 2022:64. https://rori.figshare.com/articles/report/The_changing_role_of_funders_in_responsible_research_assessment_progress_obstacles_and_the_way_ahead/13227914/2.
1.
Marissa M. Shams-White, Rolando Barajas, Roxanne E. Jensen, et al. Systems epidemiology and cancer: A review of the National Institutes of Health extramural grant portfolio 2013-2018. PloS One. 2021;16(4):e0250061. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250061
1.
Natalie Shoham, Alexandra Pitman. Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?. BJPsych Advances. 2021;27(4):247-254. doi:10.1192/bja.2020.61
1.
Belén Álvarez-Bornstein, María Bordons. Is funding related to higher research impact? Exploring its relationship and the mediating role of collaboration in several disciplines. Journal of Informetrics. 2021;15(1):101102. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101102
1.
Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle, Thiago Dias Sarti. Attitudes toward open peer review among stakeholders of a scholar-led journal in Brazil. Transinformação. 2021;33:e200072. doi:10.1590/2318-0889202133e200072
1.
Laura Cruz-Castro, Luis Sanz-Menendez. What should be rewarded? Gender and evaluation criteria for tenure and promotion. Journal of Informetrics. 2021;15(3):101196. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101196