1.
B. H. Lim, C. D’Ippoliti, M. Dominik, et al. Regional and institutional trends in assessment for academic promotion. Nature. 2025:1-10. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08422-9
Bias, peer review, and publishing
1.
Pierre Azoulay, Wesley H. Greenblatt. Does Peer Review Penalize Scientific Risk Taking? Evidence from NIH Grant Renewals.; 2025. doi:10.3386/w33495
1.
Olivia M. Smith, Kayla L. Davis, Robin Waterman, et al. Journals must expand access to peer review data. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2024;39(4):311-314. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2024.02.003
1.
Mark J. Bolland, Alison Avenell, Andrew Grey. Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 2024:1-20. doi:10.1080/03036758.2024.2325004
1.
Xi Cheng, Haoran Wang, Li Tang, Weiyan Jiang, Maotian Zhou, Guoyan Wang. Open peer review correlates with altmetrics but not with citations: Evidence from <i>Nature Communications</i> and <i>PLoS One</i>. Journal of Informetrics. 2024;18(3):101540. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2024.101540
1.
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Serge P J M Horbach. Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review. Research Evaluation. 2024:rvae004. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvae004
1.
Judith C. Madden, Helena Kandarova, Winfried Neuhaus, et al. Journeying Through Journals: The Publishing Process and How to Maximise Research Impact. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2024;52(6):334-351. doi:10.1177/02611929241286624
1.
Marta Moreno-Ibáñez, Mathieu Casado, Gwenaëlle Gremion, et al. Engagement of early career researchers in collaborative assessments of IPCC reports: achievements and insights. Frontiers in Climate. 2024;6. doi:10.3389/fclim.2024.1395040
1.
Paul Whaley, Robyn B Blain, Derek Draper, et al. Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank. Toxicological Sciences. 2024;201(2):240-253. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfae083
1.
Stefanie Schneider, Cat Morgan, Clayton Magill, Marion Hersh, Katherine Sang, Robert MacIntosh. Evidence Review: Peer Review Bias in the Funding Process: Main Themes and Interventions. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 2024. https://doi.org/10.17861/YDDH-B137.