%0 Journal Article %K Funding %K Peer Evaluation %B American Psychologist %D 2008 %N 3 %P 160-168 %R 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.160 %T Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability %U https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.160 %V 63 %8 2008 %! Improving the peer-review process for grant applications