TY - JOUR
KW - bias
KW - Communication
KW - Discussion
KW - Grant applications
KW - Innovation
KW - Leadership
KW - peer review
KW - Research funding
KW - survey
KW - Team science
AU - Stephen A. Gallo
AU - Karen B. Schmaling
AU - Lisa A. Thompson
AU - Scott R. Glisson
AB - Funding agencies have long used panel discussion in the peer review of research grant proposals as a way to utilize a set of expertise and perspectives in making funding decisions. Little research has examined the quality of panel discussions and how effectively they are facilitated.
BT - Research Integrity and Peer Review
DA - 2020-05-15
DO - 10.1186/s41073-020-00093-0
IS - 1
N2 - Funding agencies have long used panel discussion in the peer review of research grant proposals as a way to utilize a set of expertise and perspectives in making funding decisions. Little research has examined the quality of panel discussions and how effectively they are facilitated.
PY - 2020
EP - 7
T2 - Research Integrity and Peer Review
TI - Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00093-0
VL - 5
Y2 - 2024-12-12
SN - 2058-8615
ER -