TY - JOUR
KW - Scientific Communication
AU - Douglas P. Peters
AU - Stephen J. Ceci
AB - 12 research articles were resubmitted to the journals that had published them 18–32 mo previously, with ficticious names and institutions substituted for the original ones. Only 3 of the resubmissions were detected, and 8 of the remaining articles were rejected—primarily for "serious methodological flaws." Author–reviewer accountability is discussed, and recommendations for improving the peer review system are presented. Commentary on this article is provided by 56 authors along with the original authors' response. (3 p ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
BT - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
DA - 1982
DO - 10.1017/S0140525X00011183
IS - 2
N2 - 12 research articles were resubmitted to the journals that had published them 18–32 mo previously, with ficticious names and institutions substituted for the original ones. Only 3 of the resubmissions were detected, and 8 of the remaining articles were rejected—primarily for "serious methodological flaws." Author–reviewer accountability is discussed, and recommendations for improving the peer review system are presented. Commentary on this article is provided by 56 authors along with the original authors' response. (3 p ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
PY - 1982
SP - 187
EP - 195
ST - Peer-review practices of psychological journals
T2 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
TI - Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again
VL - 5
SN - 1469-1825
ER -