TY - JOUR
AU - Jeffrey Beck
AU - Kathryn Funk
AU - Melissa Harrison
AU - Jo McEntyre
AU - Josie Breen
AU - Andy Collings
AU - Paul Donohoe
AU - Michael Evans
AU - Louisa Flintoft
AU - Audrey Hamelers
AU - Phil Hurst
AU - Thomas Lemberger
AU - Jennifer Lin
AU - Niamh O'Connor
AU - Michael Parkin
AU - Sam Parker
AU - Peter Rodgers
AU - Magdalena Skipper
AU - Michael Stoner
AB - Publishing peer review materials alongside research articles promises to make the peer review process more transparent as well as making it easier to recognise these contributions and give credit to peer reviewers. Traditionally, the peer review reports, editors letters and author responses are only shared between the small number of people in those roles prior to publication, but there is a growing interest in making some or all of these materials available. A small number of journals have been publishing peer review materials for some time, others have begun this practice more recently, and significantly more are now considering how they might begin. This article outlines the outcomes from a recent workshop among journals with experience in publishing peer review materials, in which the specific operation of these workflows, and the challenges, were discussed. Here, we provide a draft as to how to represent these materials in the JATS and Crossref data models to facilitate the coordination and discoverability of peer review materials, and seek feedback on these initial recommendations.
BT - F1000Research
DA - 2018-10-17
DO - 10.12688/f1000research.16460.1
N2 - Publishing peer review materials alongside research articles promises to make the peer review process more transparent as well as making it easier to recognise these contributions and give credit to peer reviewers. Traditionally, the peer review reports, editors letters and author responses are only shared between the small number of people in those roles prior to publication, but there is a growing interest in making some or all of these materials available. A small number of journals have been publishing peer review materials for some time, others have begun this practice more recently, and significantly more are now considering how they might begin. This article outlines the outcomes from a recent workshop among journals with experience in publishing peer review materials, in which the specific operation of these workflows, and the challenges, were discussed. Here, we provide a draft as to how to represent these materials in the JATS and Crossref data models to facilitate the coordination and discoverability of peer review materials, and seek feedback on these initial recommendations.
PY - 2018
EP - 1655
T2 - F1000Research
TI - Publishing peer review materials
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206614/
VL - 7
Y2 - 2024-03-21
SN - 2046-1402
ER -