02337nas a2200361 4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260000900043653003200052653001900084653001200103653001100115653001900126653003100145653001300176653001900189653001300208653001400221653001000235653001200245653001500257100001500272700001800287700002000305700001700325700001900342245008000361856006000441300001200501490000700513520144100520022001401961 2018 d c201810aAnimal Testing Alternatives10aanimal welfare10aAnimals10aHumans10aModels, Animal10aReproducibility of Results10aResearch10aToxicity Tests10abusiness10achemicals10adrugs10aeconomy10aregulation1 aLucy Meigs1 aLena Smirnova1 aCostanza Rovida1 aMarcel Leist1 aThomas Hartung00aAnimal testing and its alternatives - the most important omics is economics uhttps://www.altex.org/index.php/altex/article/view/1134 a275-3050 v353 aFor a long time, the discussion about animal testing vs its alternatives centered on animal welfare. This was a static warfare, or at least a gridlock, where life scientists had to take a position and make their value choices and hardly anyone changed sides. Technical advances have changed the frontline somewhat, with in vitro and in silico methods gaining more ground. Only more recently has the economic view begun to have an impact: Many animal tests are simply too costly, take too long, and give misleading results. As an extension and update to previous articles in this series written a decade ago, we reanalyze the economic landscape of especially regulatory use of animal testing and this time also consider respective alternative tests. Despite some ambiguity and data gaps, which we have filled with crude estimates, a picture emerges of globally regulated industries that are subject to stark geographic and sectorial differences in regulation, which determine their corresponding animal use. Both animal testing and its alternatives are industries in their own right, offering remarkable business opportunities for biotech and IT companies as well as contract research organizations. In light of recent revelations as to the reproducibility and relevance issues of many animal tests, the economic consequences of incorrect results and the reasons for still maintaining often outdated animal test approaches are discussed. a1868-8551