01447nas a2200193   4500000000100000008004100001260000900042653001600051653002900067653001300096653002900109100001900138700001900157245008200176300001200258490000700270520096200277022001401239       2014                            d  c201410aCredibility10aExperimental Replication10aSciences10aScientific Communication1 aBrian A. Nosek1 aDaniël Lakens00aRegistered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results  a137-1410 v453 aThe published journal article is the primary means of communicating scientific ideas, methods, and empirical data. Not all ideas and data get published. In the present scientific culture, novel and positive results are considered more publishable than replications and negative results. This creates incentives to avoid or ignore replications and negative results, even at the expense of accuracy (Giner-Sorolla, 2012; Nosek, Spies, & Motyl, 2012). As a consequence, replications (Makel, Plucker, & Hegarty, 2012) and negative results (Fanelli, 2010; Sterling, 1959) are rare in the published literature. This insight is not new, but the culture is resistant to change. This article introduces the first known journal issue in any discipline consisting exclusively of preregistered replication studies. It demonstrates that replications have substantial value, and that incentives can be changed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)  a2151-2590