01063nas a2200301   4500000000100000008004100001260001500042653000900057653001800066653001500084653002300099653001500122653001500137653001600152653002100168653001100189653001700200100002100217700002300238700002100261700002100282245009600303856004700399300000600446490000600452520028900458022001400747       2020                            d  c2020-05-1510abias10aCommunication10aDiscussion10aGrant applications10aInnovation10aLeadership10apeer review10aResearch funding10asurvey10aTeam science1 aStephen A. Gallo1 aKaren B. Schmaling1 aLisa A. Thompson1 aScott R. Glisson00aGrant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion  uhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00093-0  a70 v53 aFunding agencies have long used panel discussion in the peer review of research grant proposals as a way to utilize a set of expertise and perspectives in making funding decisions. Little research has examined the quality of panel discussions and how effectively they are facilitated.  a2058-8615