02045nas a2200205   4500000000100000008004100001260001400042100001600056700001500072700001500087700002000102700001500122700001700137245014100154856005800295300001200353490000600365520145400371022001401825       2016                            d  c2016-2-171 aJ K Tijdink1 aK Schipper1 aL M Bouter1 aP Maclaine Pont1 aJ de Jonge1 aY M Smulders00aHow do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers  uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762115/  ae0086810 v63 aObjective
To investigate the biomedical scientist's perception of the prevailing publication culture.

Design
Qualitative focus group interview study.

Setting
Four university medical centres in the Netherlands.

Participants
Three randomly selected groups of biomedical scientists (PhD, postdoctoral staff members and full professors).

Main outcome measures
Main themes for discussion were selected by participants.

Results
Frequently perceived detrimental effects of contemporary publication culture were the strong focus on citation measures (like the Journal Impact Factor and the H-index), gift and ghost authorships and the order of authors, the peer review process, competition, the funding system and publication bias. These themes were generally associated with detrimental and undesirable effects on publication practices and on the validity of reported results. Furthermore, senior scientists tended to display a more cynical perception of the publication culture than their junior colleagues. However, even among the PhD students and the postdoctoral fellows, the sentiment was quite negative. Positive perceptions of specific features of contemporary scientific and publication culture were rare.

Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the current publication culture leads to negative sentiments, counterproductive stress levels and, most importantly, to questionable research practices among junior and senior biomedical scientists.  a2044-6055