01915nas a2200193   4500000000100000008004100001260001300042100002000055700001800075700002000093700001500113700001500128245012100143856005800264300000600322490000600328520137300334022001401707       2021                            d  c2021-5-31 aTamarinde Haven1 aJoeri Tijdink1 aBrian Martinson1 aLex Bouter1 aFrans Oort00aExplaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam  uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8094603/  a70 v63 aBackground
Concerns about research misbehavior in academic science have sparked interest in the factors that may explain research misbehavior. Often three clusters of factors are distinguished: individual factors, climate factors and publication factors. Our research question was: to what extent can individual, climate and publication factors explain the variance in frequently perceived research misbehaviors?

Methods
From May 2017 until July 2017, we conducted a survey study among academic researchers in Amsterdam. The survey included three measurement instruments that we previously reported individual results of and here we integrate these findings.

Results
One thousand two hundred ninety-eight researchers completed the survey (response rate: 17%). Results showed that individual, climate and publication factors combined explained 34% of variance in perceived frequency of research misbehavior. Individual factors explained 7%, climate factors explained 22% and publication factors 16%.

Conclusions
Our results suggest that the perceptions of the research climate play a substantial role in explaining variance in research misbehavior. This suggests that efforts to improve departmental norms might have a salutary effect on behavior.

Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41073-021-00110-w.  a2058-8615