01594nas a2200181   4500000000100000008004100001260001500042100001700057700001800074700001900092700002000111700001700131245008400148856004400232300001200276520111000288022001401398       2024                            d  c2024-03-251 aDavid Johann1 aJörg Neufeld1 aKathrin Thomas1 aJustus Rathmann1 aHeiko Rauhut00aThe impact of researchers’ perceived pressure on their publication strategies  uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae011  arvae0113 aThis article investigates researchers’ publication strategies and how their perceived pressure to publish and to obtain external funding are related to these strategies. The analyses rely on data from the Zurich Survey of Academics (ZSoA), an online survey representative of academics working at higher education institutions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The results suggest that academics pursue both instrumental and normative publication strategies. The main finding is that academics who perceive high pressure to publish tend to employ instrumental publication strategies rather than normative ones: they are more likely to focus on the journal's reputation and the speed of publication when selecting an outlet for peer review. Publishing results in open-access outlets or in native languages other than English is less important for those under pressure. However, the extent to which researchers’ perceived pressure affects publication strategies also depends on other factors, such as the discrepancy between the time available for research and the time actually desired for research.  a0958-2029