02660nas a2200229   4500000000100000008004100001260001200042100002000054700002300074700002200097700002200119700002100141700002100162700001800183700002900201245016000230856006900390300001400459490000700473520193600480022001402416       2023                            d  c2023-091 aAmanda L. Vogel1 aBrittany M. Haynes1 aShadab F. Hussain1 aLameese D. Akacem1 aMarcus G. Hodges1 aJosh A. Duberman1 aGisela Butera1 aJessica M. Faupel-Badger00aAreas of strength and opportunities for growth in translational science education and training: Results of a scoping review from the NCATS Education Branch  uhttps://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cts.13570  a1526-15460 v163 aAbstract Translational science education and training (E&T) aims to prepare the translational workforce to accelerate progress along the translational pipeline toward solutions that improve human health. In 2020?2021, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) Education Branch conducted a scoping review of the E&T literature with this focus. The review used the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. PubMed, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and Embase were searched, and forward citations conducted. Screening of titles, abstracts, and full text identified 44 included articles. Data extraction facilitated analysis of E&T content, audiences, modalities, evaluations, and recommendations. The NCATS Translational Science Principles were used to identity described or recommended E&T content. Twenty-nine articles described a translational science E&T opportunity or its evaluation, and another 15 articles offered recommendations for translational science E&T. The most prevalent NCATS Translational Science Principles were boundary-crossing partnerships (77%) and cross-disciplinary team science (75%). Among publications describing E&T opportunities, the most reported modalities were experiential learning (64%) and courses (61%) and the most reported participants were graduate students (68%) and postdoctoral fellows (54%). About half of these articles (n?=?15) reported an evaluation, covering a range of proximal to distal outcomes. Recommendations emphasized the value of translational science E&T across training and career stages and the use of varied modalities to reach diverse audiences. This review highlights strengths and opportunities for growth in translational science E&T. Enhancements to content, expansion of participants and modalities, and rigorous evaluations will contribute to building a highly qualified, diverse translational science workforce.  a1752-8054