01393nas a2200505   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260001200043653001600055653001500071653002400086100002300110700002000133700001700153700002100170700002300191700002100214700002200235700001900257700002000276700002100296700002300317700001700340700001500357700001500372700001900387700002300406700001800429700001800447700002100465700002000486700002100506700001800527700001800545700002300563700001700586700002000603700002100623700001900644245004500663856005500708300001200763490000800775520010400783       2020                            d  c2020-0210apeer review10aPublishing10aResearch management1 aFlaminio Squazzoni1 aPetra Ahrweiler1 aTiago Barros1 aFederico Bianchi1 aAliaksandr Birukou1 aHarry J. J. Blom1 aGiangiacomo Bravo1 aStephen Cowley1 aVirginia Dignum1 aPierpaolo Dondio1 aFrancisco Grimaldo1 aLynsey Haire1 aJason Hoyt1 aPhil Hurst1 aRachael Lammey1 aCatriona MacCallum1 aAna Marušić1 aBahar Mehmani1 aHollydawn Murray1 aDuncan Nicholas1 aGiorgio Pedrazzi1 aIratxe Puebla1 aPeter Rodgers1 aTony Ross-Hellauer1 aMarco Seeber1 aKalpana Shankar1 aJoris Van Rossum1 aMichael Willis00aUnlock ways to share data on peer review  uhttps://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00500-y  a512-5140 v5783 aJournals, funders and scholars must work together to create an infrastructure to study peer review.