01118nas a2200313   4500000000100000008004100001260001500042653000800057653000900065653001600074100002000090700001900110700001900129700001900148700001700167700002000184700001900204700001900223700002000242700002000262700001400282700002200296245005200318856007200370300001200442490000700454520032900461022001400790       2024                            d  c2024-03-1110aEDI10abias10apeer review1 aOlivia M. Smith1 aKayla L. Davis1 aRobin Waterman1 aRiley B. Pizza1 aCaitlin Mack1 aEmily E. Conway1 aKara C. Dobson1 aBrianna Foster1 aAni E. Hristova1 aJulie C. Jarvey1 aNan Nourn1 aCourtney L. Davis00aJournals must expand access to peer review data  uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534724000405  a311-3140 v393 aEmpirical studies on peer review bias are primarily conducted by people from privileged groups and with affiliations with the journals studied. Data access is one major barrier to conducting peer review research. Accordingly, we propose pathways to broaden access to peer review data to people from more diverse backgrounds.  a0169-5347