@article{4826,
  keywords = {bias, Communication, Discussion, Grant applications, Innovation, Leadership, peer review, Research funding, survey, Team science},
  author = {Stephen A. Gallo and Karen B. Schmaling and Lisa A. Thompson and Scott R. Glisson},
  title = {Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion},
  abstract = {Funding agencies have long used panel discussion in the peer review of research grant proposals as a way to utilize a set of expertise and perspectives in making funding decisions. Little research has examined the quality of panel discussions and how effectively they are facilitated.},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {Research Integrity and Peer Review},
  volume = {5},
  pages = {7},
  month = {2020-05-15},
  issn = {2058-8615},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00093-0},
  doi = {10.1186/s41073-020-00093-0},
}