@article{2916,
  keywords = {Careers, Community ecology, Medical journals, Metadata, Momentum, peer review, Scientific publishing, Zoology},
  author = {Michele Avissar-Whiting and Frédérique Belliard and Stefano M. Bertozzi and Amy Brand and Katherine Brown and Géraldine Clément-Stoneham and Stephanie Dawson and Gautam Dey and Daniel Ecer and Scott C. Edmunds and Ashley Farley and Tara D. Fischer and Maryrose Franko and James S. Fraser and Kathryn Funk and Clarisse Ganier and Melissa Harrison and Anna Hatch and Haley Hazlett and Samantha Hindle and Daniel W. Hook and Phil Hurst and Sophien Kamoun and Robert Kiley and Michael M. Lacy and Marcel LaFlamme and Rebecca Lawrence and Thomas Lemberger and Maria Leptin and Elliott Lumb and Catriona J. MacCallum and Christopher Steven Marcum and Gabriele Marinello and Alex Mendonça and Sara Monaco and Kleber Neves and Damian Pattinson and Jessica K. Polka and Iratxe Puebla and Martyn Rittman and Stephen J. Royle and Daniela Saderi and Richard Sever and Kathleen Shearer and John E. Spiro and Bodo Stern and Dario Taraborelli and Ron Vale and Claudia G. Vasquez and Ludo Waltman and Fiona M. Watt and Zara Y. Weinberg and Mark Williams},
  title = {Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science},
  abstract = {Peer review is an important part of the scientific process, but traditional peer review at journals is coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack of transparency. As preprints become more widely used and accepted, they raise the possibility of rethinking the peer-review process. Preprints are enabling new forms of peer review that have the potential to be more thorough, inclusive, and collegial than traditional journal peer review, and to thus fundamentally shift the culture of peer review toward constructive collaboration. In this Consensus View, we make a call to action to stakeholders in the community to accelerate the growing momentum of preprint sharing and provide recommendations to empower researchers to provide open and constructive peer review for preprints.},
  year = {0},
  journal = {PLOS Biology},
  volume = {22},
  pages = {e3002502},
  month = {Feb 29, 2024},
  issn = {1545-7885},
  url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3002502},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pbio.3002502},
  language = {en},
}